Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuthike, George M.
dc.contributor.authorKanali, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorShitanda, Douglas
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-04T08:11:35Z
dc.date.available2018-12-04T08:11:35Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn2006-9782
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/2099
dc.description.abstractExploitation of trees on private farms in Kenya is mainly by chain, bench and pit sawing systems, whose efficiency has not been well established. The sawing systems were evaluated for their performance using three species: Eucalyptus saligna, Grevillea robusta and Prosopis juliflora. Data was subjected to analysis of variance and mean comparisons. Results showed significant differences (P<0.05) among the sawing systems. Chainsaw system recovered more logs from the trees with a log recovery rate of 76%, which was significantly higher than those of 65 and 63% for bench and pit saws respectively. Timber recovery rates of 39.8, 35.9 and 30.0% for pit, bench and chain saws respectively were observed. The chainsaw system produced the highest rate of timber output (0.23 m 3 /man-hour), differing significantly from benchsaw (0.17) and pit saw (0.08). Chain and bench saws recorded significantly different fuel consumption rates of 8.41 and 14.86 m3 l -1 respectively. Timber sawn with the chain saw had the highest dimensional deviation (+/-5.53 mm), which was significantly higher than deviations for benchsaw (+/-3.55 mm) and pitsaw (+/-2.44 mm). The study shows that, although chainsaw recorded the highest timber production rate per man hour, it had the lowest timber recovery. Timber sawn with this system had the highest dimensional deviations. Bench saw was more economical for sawing large diameter logs, with chainsaw performing better for small diameter logs. The three systems recorded very low recovery of timber and are thus not suitable for processing timber, in this error of diminishing tree cover unless they are improved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Horticulture and Forestryen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectSawing systemsen_US
dc.subjectTimber recoveryen_US
dc.subjectProduction rateen_US
dc.subjectSizeen_US
dc.subjectDeviationen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of on-farm timber conversion systems in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record