Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaroko, Geoffrey M.
dc.contributor.authorKiai, Alice
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T06:40:05Z
dc.date.available2019-07-31T06:40:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/4680
dc.description.abstractGraduate students are usually not sure of the appropriate tense to use in each rhetorical section of their dissertations in their disciplines. Even style guides provide little information regarding tense usage in academic texts. This paper describes a study in which frequency and usage of types of tense were compared in selected dissertations from the humanities and sciences drawn from Kenyan Public Universities. It was found that graduate research students in both humanities and sciences preferred the simple present and simple past as primary tense forms. It also emerged that authors have to alternate verb tenses even in the same rhetorical section of a dissertation to achieve particular communicative purposes. Suggesting that choices for tense in dissertations are a function of the epistemology and ideology of the disciplines, the paper proposes a genre-based approach to teaching those preparing to write their dissertations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDisciplinary cultureen_US
dc.subjectPoint of referenceen_US
dc.subjectPrimary tenseen_US
dc.subjectSecondary tenseen_US
dc.subjectCommunicative purposeen_US
dc.titleTense Usage in Selected Humanities and Science Dissertationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record