dc.description.abstract | There are four books on our shelf that have
the words, more or less, “wealth of nations”
in their titles. They are Adam Smith’s 1776
pioneering work, An Inquiry into the
Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,
and three of recent vintage, David Landes’
The Wealth and Poverty of Nations, David
Warsh’s Knowledge and the Wealth of
Nations, and Eric Beinhocker’s The Origin
of Wealth. Warsh’s book is rather supportive
of current approaches to economics
while Beinhocker’s is critical, but all of
these titles attempt to explain, in various
ways, the origin of wealth and propose
how it might be increased. Curiously, none
have the word “energy” or “oil” in their
glossary (one trivial exception), and none
even have the words “natural resources.”
Adam Smith might be excused given that,
in 1776, there was essentially no science
developed about what energy was or how
it affected other things. In an age when
some 80 million barrels of oil are used
daily on a global basis, however, and when
any time the price of oil goes up a recession
follows, how can someone write a
book about economics without mentioning
energy? How can economists ignore
what might be the most important issue in
economics? In a 1982 letter to Science
magazine, Nobel Prize economist Wassily
Leontief asked, “How long will researchers
working in adjoining fields ... abstain from
expressing serious concern about the
splendid isolation within which academic
economics now finds itself?” We think
Leontief ’s question points to the heart of
the matter. Economics, as a discipline, lives
in a contrived world of its own, one connected
only tangentially to what occurs in
real economic systems. This book is a
response to Leontief ’s question and builds
a completely different, and we think much
more defensible, approach to economics. | en_US |