• Login
    View Item 
    •   MKSU Digital Repository Home
    • Research and Publications
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • View Item
    •   MKSU Digital Repository Home
    • Research and Publications
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Composition of plastic waste discarded by households and its management approaches

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text (654.5Kb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Gwada, B.
    G. Ogendi
    Makindi, S.M.
    Trott, S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Among the emerging environmental issues within Sub-Saharan Africa is the haphazard disposal of plastic waste, some of which end up downstream in the marine environment leading to negative effects. Notably there have been cases of humpback whales getting entangled in ‘ghost’ fishing nets, and endangered turtles ingesting plastic wastes in Watamu beach in Kenya. The aim of the current study was to assess the composition and management of plastic waste discarded by households in Watamu ward. Stratified random sampling was used to collect data from households in four sub-locations within Watamu ward. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (the Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher’s Exact test). The composition of plastics usually discarded as waste by households in order of dominance were low density polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, high density polyethylene and polypropylene (FH=37.959, p = 0.000). From the results, only 0.7% of respondents recycled their plastic waste. The most preferred disposal method of household plastic waste was open dumpsites (61.4%) followed by burning (12.9%) and discards (6.4%). Majority of respondents (93.6%), re-use some plastic containers for food, water, and oil storage. There was a significant difference in terms of how the respondents re-used their plastic waste in the four sub-locations (FH=36.437, p=0.005). In conclusion, the current plastic waste disposal methods at Watamu are not environmentally friendly and recycling is still at a smaller scale despite its potential to generate income and clean the environment, and promote ecosystem services and human well being.
    URI
    http://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/4158
    Collections
    • School of Environment and Natural Resources [101]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV