Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuange, E.
dc.contributor.authorSchwarze, S.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T13:18:43Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T13:18:43Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mksu.ac.ke/handle/123456780/2088
dc.description.abstractLiterature on the adoption of agricultural innovations highlights the importance exposure to these technologies for the adoption decision of small scale farmers. This study assesses the relevance of exposure and other constraints in the adoption of improved sorghum and maize cultivars in Central Tanzania. Specifically, we analyze the determinants of exposure to improved varieties; and of adoption itself, focusing more on the role of social networks. We use survey data collected from 345 farmers between September and November 2012. We apply Poisson models to assess exposure, and average treatment effect procedures to analyze adoption. Our results show that about 79% and 74% of the respondents are exposed to at least one improved variety of sorghum and maize respectively. The average intensity of exposure (number of improved cultivars a farmer is exposed to) was 1.7 for sorghum and 1.8 for maize. Farmer networks are found to be a key source of variety information, and exchange of this information among farmers is triggered when a farmer sights a variety grown in a network member’s field. Most farmers consider improved varieties of both crops generally better than traditional ones. However, while 83% of farmers think improved varieties of maize are better than traditional ones, only 54% of farmers think so for sorghum. The size of a farmer’s network is found to positively influence their intensity of exposure to improved sorghum and open-pollinated maize varieties, but not to maize hybrids. This demonstrates that farmer networks facilitate higher exposure to seed technologies with mostly missing or malfunctioning markets. We find that farmers have substantial information networks outside their own villages, and it is these often understudied networks that determine the intensity of exposure. The strength of network connections with village administrators positively affects intensity of exposure to sorghum varieties, while network connections with agricultural extension officers influence intensity of exposure positively for sorghum varieties and maize hybrids. Other determinants of exposure are age and education of household head, and household ownership of information and communication assets. Female farmers have less exposure to maize hybrids than their male counterparts. On adoption, we find that adoption rates are pretty low – just about 42% in the case of sorghum and 60% for maize. After accounting for non-exposure and selection biases, the estimated population adoption rate is 52% for sorghum and 71% for maize, implying adoption gaps of 9.3 and 10.9 percentage points, respectively. Sorghum networks positively influence adoption even after accounting for their role in exposure. However, it is the intra-village and not inter-village networks that produce this effect. Intensity of exposure influences adoption positively for both crops. Households with more female adults are more likely to adopt improved sorghum, while those with more male adults are more likely to adopt improved maize. Poor soil fertility negatively affects adoption of improved sorghum, while non-farm income activities and size of maize farm positively influence adoption of maize varieties. Farmers mentioned seed availability followed by perceived susceptibility to pests as the most limiting factors to adoption. The importance of these reasons changes if we compare farmers without past adoption experience to those who have ever adopted. These results raise a number of implications for policy design and further research, which are discussed in the last chapter of this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherICRISATen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocioeconomics Discussion Paper Series;18
dc.subjectSocial networksen_US
dc.subjectImproved cultivarsen_US
dc.titleSocial networks and the adoption of agricultural innovations: The case of improved cereal cultivars in Central Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record